<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Scriptamus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>If You Do Not Write It, You Never Said It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Human Clones May Be Among Us Now!  Who Is Ready? by Scriptamus</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/human-clones-may-be-among-us-now-who-is-ready/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scriptamus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=450#comment-189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point.  That is certainly possible.  A woman who wanted a clone could go to a medical practice specializing in ivf and instead implant the clone in the woman and she then has a normal pregnancy.  It appears to the world that this was the result of ivf.  You are right that no one would ever know unless they did DNA tests on mother and baby.

You raise a larger issue however.  Regardless of what laws are passed restricting clones, if scientists/doctors were doing it judiciously and not for the money, it would be VERY hard to catch them.  I am personally convinced that there will be attempts made (if not already made) for human reproductive cloning in the next few years.  Most attempts will probably be done by moving the parties temporarily to a nation where there are no laws governing cloning, or do it in International Waters (on board a private yacht) or done where it is illegal where the probability of getting caught would be minimal.  As you suggest, the result could easily be explained as an ivf.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  That is certainly possible.  A woman who wanted a clone could go to a medical practice specializing in ivf and instead implant the clone in the woman and she then has a normal pregnancy.  It appears to the world that this was the result of ivf.  You are right that no one would ever know unless they did DNA tests on mother and baby.</p>
<p>You raise a larger issue however.  Regardless of what laws are passed restricting clones, if scientists/doctors were doing it judiciously and not for the money, it would be VERY hard to catch them.  I am personally convinced that there will be attempts made (if not already made) for human reproductive cloning in the next few years.  Most attempts will probably be done by moving the parties temporarily to a nation where there are no laws governing cloning, or do it in International Waters (on board a private yacht) or done where it is illegal where the probability of getting caught would be minimal.  As you suggest, the result could easily be explained as an ivf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Human Clones May Be Among Us Now!  Who Is Ready? by Darkwun</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/human-clones-may-be-among-us-now-who-is-ready/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkwun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=450#comment-188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a dumb question on my part. What if a group of some sort were making clones and selling it as ivf? would anyone catch the failures as clones? without looking for it it would just look like a failed birth. unless someone was checking the dna and crossreferencing.  That probably would not happen without a reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a dumb question on my part. What if a group of some sort were making clones and selling it as ivf? would anyone catch the failures as clones? without looking for it it would just look like a failed birth. unless someone was checking the dna and crossreferencing.  That probably would not happen without a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Human Clones May Be Among Us Now!  Who Is Ready? by Scriptamus</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/human-clones-may-be-among-us-now-who-is-ready/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scriptamus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 19:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=450#comment-185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You raise a terrific point.  There is no doubt in my mind that artificial womb or not, cloning of humans will create a hist of legal--ethical--social--economic problems.  However this has ALWAYS been the case with each significant scientific / technological.  This is to be expected.  What is not to be expected is the lack of political initiative in getting out in front of these issues.  There is not reason for example that the major problems of the Internet in many cases could have been avoided had our politicians started to consider the laws and regulations immediately after the other end of the Government developed it.  The time to hold hearings and consider the nature of the regulation and legislation that might be needed re human cloning is NOW.  The Congress and the State Legislatures need not PASS LAWS now, but they should have alternatives ready for when the issue is imminent. Most importantly there will be alternatives and a cadre of legislators who are somewhat knowledgeable to provide the intellectual leadership.  But Congress and State Legislatures tend to not deal with anything until it is a crises and then it is usually too late for many rational solutions.  There is also the other danger--namely that when we have the first known human clone child or the first artificial womb, a small but loud part of our population will claim a crises, demand action and pass poor legislation as a result of their own ignorance.  That has already occurred where states have banned human cloning and at the same time, the legislation outlaws the production of many pharmaceuticals that have been in use for years.  They didn&#039;t necessarily intend to but their definitions of cloning are so naive that it covers all kinds of innocent and constructive activities.  Our government needs to be be involved during the developmental stages of new science.  But then again, with this Congress, there may be no point in learning anything as it will just give them more to gridlock about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise a terrific point.  There is no doubt in my mind that artificial womb or not, cloning of humans will create a hist of legal&#8211;ethical&#8211;social&#8211;economic problems.  However this has ALWAYS been the case with each significant scientific / technological.  This is to be expected.  What is not to be expected is the lack of political initiative in getting out in front of these issues.  There is not reason for example that the major problems of the Internet in many cases could have been avoided had our politicians started to consider the laws and regulations immediately after the other end of the Government developed it.  The time to hold hearings and consider the nature of the regulation and legislation that might be needed re human cloning is NOW.  The Congress and the State Legislatures need not PASS LAWS now, but they should have alternatives ready for when the issue is imminent. Most importantly there will be alternatives and a cadre of legislators who are somewhat knowledgeable to provide the intellectual leadership.  But Congress and State Legislatures tend to not deal with anything until it is a crises and then it is usually too late for many rational solutions.  There is also the other danger&#8211;namely that when we have the first known human clone child or the first artificial womb, a small but loud part of our population will claim a crises, demand action and pass poor legislation as a result of their own ignorance.  That has already occurred where states have banned human cloning and at the same time, the legislation outlaws the production of many pharmaceuticals that have been in use for years.  They didn&#8217;t necessarily intend to but their definitions of cloning are so naive that it covers all kinds of innocent and constructive activities.  Our government needs to be be involved during the developmental stages of new science.  But then again, with this Congress, there may be no point in learning anything as it will just give them more to gridlock about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Human Clones May Be Among Us Now!  Who Is Ready? by Mark</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/human-clones-may-be-among-us-now-who-is-ready/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=450#comment-184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article.
I&#039;m not erhically opposed to the idea of clones. But I am concerned for them. You didn&#039;t discuss the ethical considerations within capitalism. I might be wrong, but I thought I read that with stem cell research there have been advances in artificial womb technology. Now, what if in the near future a pharmacuetical corporation was able to not only clone, but clone within an artificial womb for the market. Say to infertile parents who are willing to pay to adopt the cloned offspring. Would the corporation be the parent? Would the child be a commodity? A slave? What if the parents changed their mind? Would the state buy the child or would we see a future with corporate orphanages full of cloned children. 
I&#039;m not so sure the future will be all sweetness and light.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.<br />
I&#8217;m not erhically opposed to the idea of clones. But I am concerned for them. You didn&#8217;t discuss the ethical considerations within capitalism. I might be wrong, but I thought I read that with stem cell research there have been advances in artificial womb technology. Now, what if in the near future a pharmacuetical corporation was able to not only clone, but clone within an artificial womb for the market. Say to infertile parents who are willing to pay to adopt the cloned offspring. Would the corporation be the parent? Would the child be a commodity? A slave? What if the parents changed their mind? Would the state buy the child or would we see a future with corporate orphanages full of cloned children.<br />
I&#8217;m not so sure the future will be all sweetness and light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Turkish Discrimination Against Christian Schools&#8211;Or Is It? by otto bcn</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/408/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[otto bcn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 02:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=408#comment-165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey There. I discovered your blog using msn. This is a really well written article. I&#039;ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read extra of your helpful info. Thanks for the post. I&#039;ll definitely comeback.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey There. I discovered your blog using msn. This is a really well written article. I&#8217;ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read extra of your helpful info. Thanks for the post. I&#8217;ll definitely comeback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ladies of the Laboratory 2:  How in a Few Months Late in the 19th Century One Man Who Had Little Interest in Gender Equality Hired More Female Astronomers than the World Had Ever Known by Astronomy is the oldest of the natural sciences &#171; Wed-Gie</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/ladies-of-the-laboratory-2-how-in-a-few-months-late-in-the-19th-century-one-man-who-had-little-interest-in-gender-equality-hired-more-female-astronomers-than-the-world-had-ever-known/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astronomy is the oldest of the natural sciences &#171; Wed-Gie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=392#comment-163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ^ Lewis D. Eigen, &#8220;Ladies of the Laboratory 2: How in a Few Months Late in the 19th Century One Man Who Had Little Interest in Gender Equality Hired More Female Astronomers than the World Had Ever Known&#8221;, Scriptamus, December 2009 http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/ladies-of-the-laboratory-2-how-in-a-few-months-late-in-th... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ^ Lewis D. Eigen, &#8220;Ladies of the Laboratory 2: How in a Few Months Late in the 19th Century One Man Who Had Little Interest in Gender Equality Hired More Female Astronomers than the World Had Ever Known&#8221;, Scriptamus, December 2009 <a href="http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/ladies-of-the-laboratory-2-how-in-a-few-months-late-in-th" rel="nofollow">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/ladies-of-the-laboratory-2-how-in-a-few-months-late-in-th</a>&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Conundrum of Religious Freedom for Jews by Scriptamus</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/05/10/the-conundrum-of-religious-freedom-for-jews/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scriptamus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=497#comment-160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks so much for your comment.  It is important because you and many others do not have a problem at the Wailing Wall and you resonably conclude that there is no problem at all.

First, please understand that the woman&#039;s area you prayed in was only created after several repeated orders of the Israeli Supreme Court.  Those Rabbis who control the wallou dragged their feet for years, but at least this is done.  

Here is what would have caused a major incident, probably accompanied by violence as you can read past reports in the Israeli Newpapers.

1.  You did not wear a Talit.  Had you, you would have been accosted.
2.  You prayed, but did not LEAD a prayer.  If a woman leads other women in prayer at the wall, it is a major problem.
3.  You did not pray with scripture--a torah.  Men may carry a torah and read from it or lead prayers.  When women try to read from the torah, the trouble begins.

If you are honestly interested I will try to get you a video of women praying with a torah actually being physically beaten.

There are other problems, because of the gender discrimination, a mother may not attend a son&#039;s bar mitsva at the wall.  An American rabbi tried to lead his congregation in prayer at the wall but was not allowed as he had women in the congregation.  For the ultra orthodox, they want segregation of the sexes and they should have that opportunity with a male area and a female area.  But there should be a third area where mixed gender couples or groups can have access to the wall.  Most orthodox Israelis have no problem with this, but the few who control the Wailing Wall not only i=want to control their own members but they want to control ALL including the Jews who do not agree with them.  Each step takes repeated court battles, and continuous violation of Israeli law treating all Jews equally.  Did you observe any of the &quot;forbidden&quot; behavior I have described?  If so, please let me know as there may be some recent progress.  If you did not, p;ese accept my word that these are all problems.  Women have been arrested over reading a torah.  Please reconsider your characterization of my article as a rant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for your comment.  It is important because you and many others do not have a problem at the Wailing Wall and you resonably conclude that there is no problem at all.</p>
<p>First, please understand that the woman&#8217;s area you prayed in was only created after several repeated orders of the Israeli Supreme Court.  Those Rabbis who control the wallou dragged their feet for years, but at least this is done.  </p>
<p>Here is what would have caused a major incident, probably accompanied by violence as you can read past reports in the Israeli Newpapers.</p>
<p>1.  You did not wear a Talit.  Had you, you would have been accosted.<br />
2.  You prayed, but did not LEAD a prayer.  If a woman leads other women in prayer at the wall, it is a major problem.<br />
3.  You did not pray with scripture&#8211;a torah.  Men may carry a torah and read from it or lead prayers.  When women try to read from the torah, the trouble begins.</p>
<p>If you are honestly interested I will try to get you a video of women praying with a torah actually being physically beaten.</p>
<p>There are other problems, because of the gender discrimination, a mother may not attend a son&#8217;s bar mitsva at the wall.  An American rabbi tried to lead his congregation in prayer at the wall but was not allowed as he had women in the congregation.  For the ultra orthodox, they want segregation of the sexes and they should have that opportunity with a male area and a female area.  But there should be a third area where mixed gender couples or groups can have access to the wall.  Most orthodox Israelis have no problem with this, but the few who control the Wailing Wall not only i=want to control their own members but they want to control ALL including the Jews who do not agree with them.  Each step takes repeated court battles, and continuous violation of Israeli law treating all Jews equally.  Did you observe any of the &#8220;forbidden&#8221; behavior I have described?  If so, please let me know as there may be some recent progress.  If you did not, p;ese accept my word that these are all problems.  Women have been arrested over reading a torah.  Please reconsider your characterization of my article as a rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Conundrum of Religious Freedom for Jews by rebeccaaskenazi</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/05/10/the-conundrum-of-religious-freedom-for-jews/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rebeccaaskenazi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=497#comment-159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I prayed at the wall along side with many women who were davaning.  In fact, I kissed the wall and no one stopped any of us.  I don&#039;t get this rambling missive at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prayed at the wall along side with many women who were davaning.  In fact, I kissed the wall and no one stopped any of us.  I don&#8217;t get this rambling missive at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Research Weakens Anti-Embryonic Stem Cell Supporters by Scriptamus</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/new-research-weakens-anti-embryonic-stem-cell-supporters/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scriptamus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 17:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=467#comment-158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are absolutely right.  Men produce billions of sperm cells in their lifetimes.  Females produce hundreds of egg cells.  Of those that are fertilized and make it to the embryo stage only some will become a person and be born alive.  That is the way reproduction works in humans; there are more than are needed for human replacement and rational growth.  So it is with all life.  We who are alive are the lucky ones who not only made it to the embryonic and then birth stages, but have survived the many dangers that face organisms.  But the fact that you and I are among the lucky ones has nothing to do with the use of embryos which will never be brought to term anyway.  So what is the point?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely right.  Men produce billions of sperm cells in their lifetimes.  Females produce hundreds of egg cells.  Of those that are fertilized and make it to the embryo stage only some will become a person and be born alive.  That is the way reproduction works in humans; there are more than are needed for human replacement and rational growth.  So it is with all life.  We who are alive are the lucky ones who not only made it to the embryonic and then birth stages, but have survived the many dangers that face organisms.  But the fact that you and I are among the lucky ones has nothing to do with the use of embryos which will never be brought to term anyway.  So what is the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Child Soldiers Are Unfortunately Nothing New by Ranya</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/child-soldiers-are-unfortunately-nothing-new/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 16:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=236#comment-157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but when did it start?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but when did it start?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Child Soldiers Are Unfortunately Nothing New by Scriptamus</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/child-soldiers-are-unfortunately-nothing-new/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scriptamus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 17:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=236#comment-156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True.  Not all Moslem countries use child soldiers.  Most do not.  But some do.  The worst recent  case was Iran using tens of thousands of young boys to go ahead of the regular soldiers into mined and heavily armed areas during the Iran-Iraw War.

Today, the problem is greatest (Moslem and non Moslem) with non state militias and armies where the practice is still common.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True.  Not all Moslem countries use child soldiers.  Most do not.  But some do.  The worst recent  case was Iran using tens of thousands of young boys to go ahead of the regular soldiers into mined and heavily armed areas during the Iran-Iraw War.</p>
<p>Today, the problem is greatest (Moslem and non Moslem) with non state militias and armies where the practice is still common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Child Soldiers Are Unfortunately Nothing New by Omar</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/child-soldiers-are-unfortunately-nothing-new/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Omar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 14:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=236#comment-155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not all Muslim countries do that, i haven&#039;t even heard of a Muslim country do that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all Muslim countries do that, i haven&#8217;t even heard of a Muslim country do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Research Weakens Anti-Embryonic Stem Cell Supporters by Bligh</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/new-research-weakens-anti-embryonic-stem-cell-supporters/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bligh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 09:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=467#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your article is extremely biased. A point I would like to make is that at one point in time, YOU were an embryo, and if that embryo had been destroyed, you would not be alive. Food for thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is extremely biased. A point I would like to make is that at one point in time, YOU were an embryo, and if that embryo had been destroyed, you would not be alive. Food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Human Clones May Be Among Us Now!  Who Is Ready? by Mark Peaty</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/human-clones-may-be-among-us-now-who-is-ready/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Peaty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=450#comment-151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[did nobody here see The Island (2005) with Scarlet Johansson and Ewan McGregor?  A great movie I thought, apart from some of the over the top &#039;action&#039; fun. But the underlying moral theme of persons cloned, kept alive and in complete ignorance of their true fate, before being harvested for their body parts, is one of the major issues that is likely to arise in future. 

I think that to meet this and other related challenges we need to keep track of the truly basic issues of human life and survival which I think is the meaning of the word wisdom. In this modern era that requires not  being fettered by concepts which were only valid in the pre scientific era. For example appeals to the supernatural are really not helpful. Old words on the other hand can be refined to greater clarity and ethical effectiveness. For example: &quot;evil&quot; is that which occurs as, when, and to the extent that a person is treated as if he or she is a mere thing and not a person. Analise the actions and policies of your local leaders, bureaucracies and commercial organisations to see how they score against that definition of evil.  Let them know about it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did nobody here see The Island (2005) with Scarlet Johansson and Ewan McGregor?  A great movie I thought, apart from some of the over the top &#8216;action&#8217; fun. But the underlying moral theme of persons cloned, kept alive and in complete ignorance of their true fate, before being harvested for their body parts, is one of the major issues that is likely to arise in future. </p>
<p>I think that to meet this and other related challenges we need to keep track of the truly basic issues of human life and survival which I think is the meaning of the word wisdom. In this modern era that requires not  being fettered by concepts which were only valid in the pre scientific era. For example appeals to the supernatural are really not helpful. Old words on the other hand can be refined to greater clarity and ethical effectiveness. For example: &#8220;evil&#8221; is that which occurs as, when, and to the extent that a person is treated as if he or she is a mere thing and not a person. Analise the actions and policies of your local leaders, bureaucracies and commercial organisations to see how they score against that definition of evil.  Let them know about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Human Clones May Be Among Us Now!  Who Is Ready? by KG</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/human-clones-may-be-among-us-now-who-is-ready/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=450#comment-147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kathleen Courtney you wrote a nice story for a movie.  Scientists, please continue your good work, I can&#039;t wait to read the whole report on the first reproductive clone to be born from a womb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen Courtney you wrote a nice story for a movie.  Scientists, please continue your good work, I can&#8217;t wait to read the whole report on the first reproductive clone to be born from a womb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rights &amp; Protections of Coming Human Clones: A Remarkable Lutheran View by bobby</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/03/19/rights-protections-of-coming-human-clones-a-remarkable-lutheran-view/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=475#comment-146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this has nothing to do with rights for human cloning im very disappointed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this has nothing to do with rights for human cloning im very disappointed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Human Clones May Be Among Us Now!  Who Is Ready? by Kathleen Courtney</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/human-clones-may-be-among-us-now-who-is-ready/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathleen Courtney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 08:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=450#comment-143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we allow cloning there would be no need for humans because top government officials can make their own population. They would not need man an woman because their is cloning. They can create their army. Clones would be without illness because they can alter the DNA. Surely people have put some thought into this? Clones would be no more than ants or bees. Trained to think and do as they are told. Created for one purpose. Who cares if a couple can have a baby b/c their would be no more mother no more families. Just workers to protect and serve. No individuals. So cheer on clones and see if I am not right. Long gone are the days of birth as we know it b/c there would be one person as queen who is cloned or king. Doesn&#039;t really matter. They will not have the ability to mate. I say watch out b/c cloning could kill the human race as we know it. What other real purpose would there honestly be for cloning, but to change the way the government runs the country. How would they kill off those who are born to create, but through war I am sure. Create supreme beings through cloning an gone are the days of husband an wife families. Gone are the days of choices an decisions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we allow cloning there would be no need for humans because top government officials can make their own population. They would not need man an woman because their is cloning. They can create their army. Clones would be without illness because they can alter the DNA. Surely people have put some thought into this? Clones would be no more than ants or bees. Trained to think and do as they are told. Created for one purpose. Who cares if a couple can have a baby b/c their would be no more mother no more families. Just workers to protect and serve. No individuals. So cheer on clones and see if I am not right. Long gone are the days of birth as we know it b/c there would be one person as queen who is cloned or king. Doesn&#8217;t really matter. They will not have the ability to mate. I say watch out b/c cloning could kill the human race as we know it. What other real purpose would there honestly be for cloning, but to change the way the government runs the country. How would they kill off those who are born to create, but through war I am sure. Create supreme beings through cloning an gone are the days of husband an wife families. Gone are the days of choices an decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Louisiana Interracial Marriage Incident Has a Positive Aspect by Pushing the &#34;gay&#34; agenda in schools..</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/louisiana-interracial-marriage-incident-has-a-positive-aspect/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pushing the &#34;gay&#34; agenda in schools..]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Conundrum of Religious Freedom for Jews by G. Dunnington</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/05/10/the-conundrum-of-religious-freedom-for-jews/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G. Dunnington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=497#comment-130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your article is, on the whole, very thoughtful and well-considered. I do however, owing to the accident of my own predilections in the area of historical study, would suggest that there is both military ineptitude as well as post-war political consideration in the decision to use nuclear weapons on Japan.

First the United States failed to pursue an even half-intelligent naval war against Japan, due to the conservatism, self interest and technical incompetence of its naval elite. The possibility of an aerial and submarine blockade of Japan - eminently possible, as evidenced by the U-boat campaign against our shipping in the Battle of the Atlantic, accomplished (as far as it was) by resources and cooperation far inferior to what the US had in the Pacific, was never consciously pursued until it became a fait accompli because of overwhelming material superiority, and even then, it was not pursued to the end.

Second, the faction of the US elite represented by the associates of MacArthur and various financial interests who wished to be paid back their prewar investments by Japan&#039;s military and industrial rulers, did not wish a blockaded Japan to have the inevitable revolution against the crown and the zaibatsu that would have ensued, as it did in a similarly blockaded Germany in 1918. It was politically expedient to murder hundreds of thousands of civilians instead.

Third, as has been pointed out numerous times elsewhere, the US wanted to demonstrate to Stalin&#039;s Russia that its overwhelming superiority on the ground in Europe was not going to be allowed to trump the Western Allies in the postwar negotiations to divide Hitler&#039;s empire.

The American obsession with saving the lives of its military typically blinds Americans to the self interest of its elites, and, in the end, to the interests of ordinary Americans themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is, on the whole, very thoughtful and well-considered. I do however, owing to the accident of my own predilections in the area of historical study, would suggest that there is both military ineptitude as well as post-war political consideration in the decision to use nuclear weapons on Japan.</p>
<p>First the United States failed to pursue an even half-intelligent naval war against Japan, due to the conservatism, self interest and technical incompetence of its naval elite. The possibility of an aerial and submarine blockade of Japan &#8211; eminently possible, as evidenced by the U-boat campaign against our shipping in the Battle of the Atlantic, accomplished (as far as it was) by resources and cooperation far inferior to what the US had in the Pacific, was never consciously pursued until it became a fait accompli because of overwhelming material superiority, and even then, it was not pursued to the end.</p>
<p>Second, the faction of the US elite represented by the associates of MacArthur and various financial interests who wished to be paid back their prewar investments by Japan&#8217;s military and industrial rulers, did not wish a blockaded Japan to have the inevitable revolution against the crown and the zaibatsu that would have ensued, as it did in a similarly blockaded Germany in 1918. It was politically expedient to murder hundreds of thousands of civilians instead.</p>
<p>Third, as has been pointed out numerous times elsewhere, the US wanted to demonstrate to Stalin&#8217;s Russia that its overwhelming superiority on the ground in Europe was not going to be allowed to trump the Western Allies in the postwar negotiations to divide Hitler&#8217;s empire.</p>
<p>The American obsession with saving the lives of its military typically blinds Americans to the self interest of its elites, and, in the end, to the interests of ordinary Americans themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Many Religious Fundamentalists Will Protect Human Clones by Human Clones May Be Among Us Now! Who Is Ready? &#171; Scriptamus</title>
		<link>http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/2010/02/19/many-religious-fundamentalists-will-protect-human-clones/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Human Clones May Be Among Us Now! Who Is Ready? &#171; Scriptamus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 21:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scriptamus.wordpress.com/?p=472#comment-126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] strongly religious people would actually protect clones and assist in  the birth of a clone.  See Many Religious Fundamentalists Will Protect Human Clones in the Feb 2010 issue of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] strongly religious people would actually protect clones and assist in  the birth of a clone.  See Many Religious Fundamentalists Will Protect Human Clones in the Feb 2010 issue of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
